Answers to 79 questions are to be prepared by examining 3,500 pages of the case, the written order of the Islamabad High Court in the acquittal petition is yet to come; Text of petition of Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi
Monday 11 November 2024
Islamabad (News International New Latest. November 11, 2024) An important application has been prepared by the leader of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi in the 190 million pounds case, in which 2 weeks time is given to answer the questions. It has been requested. According to the details, Barristers Salman Safdar, Usman Gul and Zaheer Abbas will file the application on behalf of former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his wife, in which founder chairman PTI and Bushra Bibi have given 2 weeks time to answer the questions. has requested.
In the text of the application, it is said that two weeks should be given to submit the answers to 79 questions, the proceedings should be carried forward in accordance with the order of the Islamabad High Court in the acquittal applications, after reviewing the 3,500 pages of the case, 79 questions should be answered. The answer is to be prepared, the written order of the Islamabad High Court in the plea of acquittal is yet to come.
On the other hand, the NAB questionnaire for the 342 statement of former Prime Minister Imran Khan in the 190 million pounds case has come out, the court provided the questionnaire containing 14 pages and 79 questions to the founder PTI. I have heard and understood the evidence of the prosecution against me? What do you say about the fact that you, as prime minister, obtained 458 kanals of land from the co-accused in the name of Al-Qadir Trust as an illegal financial gain? What do you say about the co-accused benefits in exchange for illegal financial benefits? With the connivance of Shahzad Akbar and you, a note was presented on 2nd December 2019 which falsely stated that the funds frozen in the UK would be surrendered to the State of Pakistan, deliberately misrepresenting that the Supreme Court Account It is being run for the benefit of the state of Pakistan.
In the NAB questionnaire, it is alleged that you as Prime Minister dishonestly violated the Rules of Business, 1973 by asking for the said note to be presented as an additional agenda item without any prior circulation, contrary to the fact that Mirza Shahzad Akbar Before your connivance, the secret document had been signed and submitted to the UK's National Crime Agency on November 6, 2019. was signed as a witness and the funds were already transferred before the meeting of 3rd December 2019 as land price paid by co-accused Malik Riaz.
In the questionnaire, NAB says that in the cabinet meeting on December 3, 2019, the said note was presented in an in-camera briefing, the approval of paragraph 10 of the note and the sealing of the document without discussion was insisted on while on your pressure The additional agenda was approved without deliberation, in return for illegal benefits to the co-accused, you got 485 kanals of land for Al-Qadir University project, in return for illegal favors, Farhat Shahzadi. As a front person of Bushra Imran Khan, he obtained 240 kanals of land in Mauza Mohra Noor, Islamabad from co-accused Malik Riaz as a financial benefit. What do you say about this?
NAB has asked that the State Bank of Pakistan was not consulted regarding the illegal transfer of 190 million pounds from Great Britain to Pakistan, what do you say about it? According to the record, there was no consultation with the Foreign Office and the Pakistani High Commission in the UK on this matter. What do you say about this? Bahria Town donated 285 million rupees in cash to Al-Qadir University Trust, while a donation of 450 million rupees was given for building, furniture and land, what do you say about it? No opinion was sought from the Ministry of Law regarding the return of 190 million pounds from Britain to Pakistan, what do you have to say about it?
It has been said in the questionnaire that on February 18, 2021, 50 million rupees were transferred from the account of Bahria Town Karachi to Al-Qadir Trust University, what is your position on this? Shahzad Akbar controlled all the affairs of the East Recovery Unit and most of the records were in his personal possession and he attended the National Crime Agency meetings with Barrister Zia-ul-Mustafa Naseem. What do you say about this? Barrister Zia-ul-Mustafa Naseem's duty was to assist the Asset Recovery Unit and legal proceedings were initiated for the return of illegal assets from abroad in consultation with the Ministry of Law, what do you say about it? Co-accused Shahzad Akbar deleted the proposal related to the approval of the Ministry of Law and Justice and also made amendments in the note.
Imran Khan was questioned that according to the witness Parvez Khattak, in the cabinet meeting on December 3, 2019, Shahzad Akbar presented an additional agenda and told that an agreement has been reached between Pakistan and the United Kingdom and it has been agreed that whatever is illegal in the United Kingdom. If the money is found, it will be confiscated and returned to the government of Pakistan. What do you have to say about it? According to the witness Parvez Khattak, Shahzada Kabir showed a sealed envelope related to the agreement in the cabinet meeting and told that 190 million pounds of Pakistan have been confiscated in Britain, which will be sent back to the government of Pakistan. The cabinet members raised objections regarding the contents of the agreement. But Shahzad Akbar told the cabinet that the agreement was secret on which the cabinet members kept silent, after that the cabinet approved the agenda which you were heading as the prime minister, what do you say about it?
NAB has said in the questionnaire that according to the witness Zubaidah Jalal, the agenda of the meeting is circulated before the cabinet meeting according to the rules. What do you say? According to Gwar Zubaidah Jalal, Shahzad Akbar told the cabinet meeting that this matter is confidential and there is no need to discuss it. What is your position on it? According to Zubaidah Jalal, the cabinet members wanted to discuss this issue, but Shahzad Akbar insisted on the approval of this additional agenda without discussing it as it was confidential and he also used his influence to approve the agenda. What do you say?
NAB says that according to witness Azam Khan, Shahzad Akbar had come to seek his approval regarding presenting the confidential deed in the upcoming cabinet meeting, Shahzad Akbar had also told Azam Khan that he had given permission to Shahzad Akbar. What do you say that the deed should not be presented to the cabinet? According to the statement of witness Umair Ahmed, he provided you with the details of the pending inquiries and investigations related to Malik Riaz and Bahria Town, what do you say about it? According to the evidence of Mian Umar Nadeem, the investigator of the case, a special account was opened by the Registrar Supreme Court in the light of the Supreme Court's decision of 21 March 2019 to approve the offer of 460 billion rupees for the payment of the land of Bahria Town Karachi. According to the evidence, this account was mentioned in the confidential deed, the purpose of which was to pay for the land of Bahria Town Karachi, and this account was not the account of the State of Pakistan. What do you say about this?
Comments
Post a Comment